Assessment of the impact of electromagnetic radiation on dental hard tissues

Assessment of the impact of electromagnetic radiation on dental hard tissues

Authors

  • Шукурова У.А., Хатамова Ш.А.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57231/j.idmfs.2026.5.2.001

Keywords:

electromagnetic radiation; hard dental tissues; oral fluid; oxidative stress; hypersensitivity

Abstract

The increasing every day and occupational exposure to radiofrequency (RF) and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation (EMR) necessitates assessment of its potential association with the condition of hard dental tissues and oral fluid parameters. The aim was to evaluate the status of hard dental tissues under different levels of EMR exposure using an integrated exposure assessment and oral-fluid biomarkers. Materials and methods: exposure was assessed using the developed composite index EMI-CI (0–100 points) incorporating RF and ELF domains; four exposure levels were defined (≤25; 25–49; 50–74; ≥75). For in-depth analysis, “extreme” groups were formed: the main group (EMI-CI ≥75; n=90), the comparison group (≤25; n=45), and the control group (n=20). Clinical assessment included DMF, ICDAS, BOP, Schiff Air Index, and NRS; laboratory assessment included sIgA, lysozyme, phagocytosis, MDA, SOD, and GPx; statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: in the total sample (n=360), the distribution of the total score was as follows: low exposure (≤25 points) — 13.9% (n=50), moderate (25–49) — 11.1% (n=40), increased (50–74) — 47.3% (n=170), and high (≥75) — 27.7% (n=100). Dentin hypersensitivity was detected in 91.1% of the main group, 24.4% of the comparison group, and 15% of controls. Lipid peroxidation/antioxidant defense parameters differed between groups: MDA (control 3.46±0.17; comparison 5.47±0.27; main 7.53±0.38 μmol/L), SOD (5.84±0.29; 7.57±0.38; 4.23±0.21 U/mL), GPx (208.35±10.42; 258.34±12.91; 124.47±6.22 U/min). Conclusion: comprehensive assessment with EMI-CI calculation enables RF/ELF exposure stratification and comparison with clinical and laboratory indicators characterizing the condition of hard dental tissues and oral fluid.

References

Васильева Т.И., Сарокваша О.Ю. Влияние электромагнитного поля сотового телефона на организм человека в зависимости от возраста // Вестник Самарского государственного университета. 2012. № 3/2 (94). С. 29–36.

Жаворонков Л.П., Петин В.Г. Влияние электромагнитных излучений сотовых телефонов на здоровье // Радиация и риск. 2016. Т. 25. № 2. С. 43–56.

Нигматов Р.Н., Якубова Ф.Х., Нигматова Н.Р. Электрометрические и морфологические исследования твёрдых тканей зубов при их избирательной пришлифовки // Стоматология. 2013. № 3–4 (53–54). С. 32–37.

СанПиН №0269-09 от 22.06.2009. При работе с источниками электромагнитных полей радиочастот (нормирование, контроль, измерения) [Электронный ресурс]. — Режим доступа: Lex.uz.

Семенова Н.В., Денисов А.П., Денисова О.А., Кун О.А., Кузюкова А.В. Влияние электромагнитного излучения от сотовых телефонов на здоровье детей и подростков (обзор литературы) // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016. № 6-4. С. 701–705.

Andrianome S., Yahia-Cherif L., Selmaoui B. Effect of short exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on saliva biomarkers: a study on the electrohypersensitive individuals // International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2019. Vol. 95, No. 6. P. 788–792. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1569776.

Buczko P., Zalewska A., Szarmach I. Saliva and oxidative stress in oral cavity and in some systemic disorders // Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2015. Vol. 66, No. 1. P. 3–9.

Čižmárová B., Tomečková V., Hubková B., et al. Salivary Redox Homeostasis in Human Health and Disease // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022. Vol. 23, No. 17. Art. 10076. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231710076.

Enax J., Fandrich P., Schulze E., et al. The Remineralization of Enamel from Saliva: A Chemical Perspective // Dentistry Journal. 2024. Vol. 12, No. 11. Art. 339.

Hamzany Y., Feinmesser R., Shpitzer T., et al. Is human saliva an indicator of the adverse health effects of using mobile phones? // Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2013. Vol. 18, No. 6. P. 622–627. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2012.4751.

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz) // Health Physics. 2020. Vol. 118, No. 5. P. 483–524. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.

Martins A.M., et al. Salivary biomarkers of oxidative stress in children with dental caries: Systematic review and meta-analysis // Archives of Oral Biology. 2022. Vol. 139. Art. 105432.

Verrender A, Manley J, Wallace NK, Loughran SP, Croft RJ. Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF): Does RF-EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response? Bioelectromagnetics. 2025 Sep; 46(6): e70021. doi: 10.1002/bem.70021. PMID: 40908801; PMCID: PMC12411804.

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Article
Loading...